Saturday, July 28, 2012

Coming To A Pharmacy Near You

If any of you happen to be Jeopardy! fans, then you'll know that computers are capable of answering questions posed in natural language, and come up with answers faster and more accurately than any mere human could do it.

And I've noticed that the people who invest in this type of technology always seem to dispel concern that advances in technology would replace any existing workers, saying it simply would "support" existing staff in order to perform their duties more efficiently.

Yet, the people who market these technologies always seem to highlight the advantages of replacing "less efficient" and "more costly" human workers as a selling point.

So, who do you believe? Are you drinking their Kool-Aid, or are you able to think for yourself?

Given time, I can't see any reason why these two technologies couldn't be incorporated to provide the advisory services traditionally provided by a pharmacist, and replace us. And considering the costs of pharmacists' salaries and benefits, this type of technology would pay for itself very quickly.


Source: AVA the Virtual Assistant

3 comments:

  1. That's it! I'm going on a fake hunger strike and show these corporations just who they're messing with.

    ReplyDelete
  2. IBM's Watson—the same machine that beat Ken Jennings at Jeopardy—is now churning through case histories at Memorial Sloan-Kettering, learning to make diagnoses and treatment recommendations.

    Source: The Robot Will See You Now

    ReplyDelete
  3. verapamil 40 mg is utilized for heart-related chest torment, hypertension, and a few kinds of irregular pulses. It works by relaxing veins to bring down the pulse. This assists with lessening the workload of the heart.

    ReplyDelete